Urgent E-mail to my Mr Stride, MP for Central Devon, further to that of 27-06-17 (below and with automatic response only)
Sarin Use at Khan Sheikhoun in Syria. The Response of the UK Foreign Secretary
THE HAGUE, Netherlands — 30 June 2017 — In a report released by the Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW), the OPCW Fact-Finding Mission (FFM) confirmed that people were exposed to sarin, a chemical weapon, on 4 April 2017 in the Khan Shaykhun area, Idlib Province in the Syrian Arab Republic.
(This comes, conveniently, a few days after threats made by Messrs Trump and Spicer.)
The assertion of Mr Boris Johnson, Foreign Secretary as broadcast on the BBC Today programme today (30-06-17)
“There is abundant evidence that the Assad regime (or similar) was responsible …..
There has been much talk from the UK about the need to 'topple' President Doctor Bashar Assad, and one assumes in the manner of President Ghaddafi.
Has Mr Johnson been rational in his analysis of the maelstrom in Syria, created by the UK,US, NATO countries , and Israel along with the surrogates in the Arabian Peninsula?
He has shown no balance but only an arrogant disregard for the further loss and maiming of Syrian people, and the creation of yet more terrified refugees.
Dear Mr Shaw,
I have not heard from you, as one of the 25 million licence payers and someone with a close knowledge of the Middle East. This country is in TROUBLE and its citizens should be informed for several reasons.
The number of arrests following this latest killing is unprecedented. That suggests a large cell. The picture painted by Tony Cartalucci appears to fit. That is there is an organization bent on further killing and mayhem that has had a benign relationship with the SIS. If this organization is the LIFG and the UK has colluded with it, we must be told.
You will know by now. Is this cell LIFG and if not, what is its character/name.
Dr Derek Summerfield, with many doctors, has been attempting to limit or stop the torture of Palestinian adults and children by Israel since 2009. The campaign was re-ignited two years ago with the support of 67 doctors. The plea - 'for doctors in Israel to observe their ethical code and the Declaration of Tokyo by not taking ANY part in torture.' This time Sir Michael Marmot was approached as President of the World Medical Association. His response was not adequate. I do not believe he has communicated with Dr Summerfield at all. The correspondence can be made available.
There can be little that is more serious than this. Please read the letter to Baroness Lawrence at the foot. She was addressed having suffered the loss of her dear son and because she is a member of the Joint Human Rights Committee.
A letter to Admiral Sir Richard Ibbotson, dated April 13th 2017
Admiral Sir Richard Ibbotson KBE, CB, DSC, DLChairman of the Board of the Torbay and South Devon NHS Trust
Dear Sir Richard,
I write to you in your position as Commander of HMS Torbay! I assume you have ultimate responsibility for the actions, both good and bad, that take place under you. Thus I bring to you a very disturbing facet of the new plan for 'care at home'.
I am confident in writing to you because I was trained very well in all specialisms at St Mary's Hospital, qualifying in 1964. I then spent 11 years training in surgery, the last 5 being in orthopaedic and trauma surgery. I was appointed to serve in this role at Torbay in 1975. Although my 77th birthday is tomorrow, I have continued to take the closest interest in our medical services and in my fellow man, both here and in the world.
My central concern (among many) is contained in the annexe below - “prevention of hospital admissions”. This duty, as stated, is unethical. Furthermore, it places a burden on a person who has not been asked to provide evidence of any relevant qualification. Any conscientious GP would always consider whether admission to hospital was necessary and many would have the great benefit of observing/treating some patients in the local Community Hospital. So the only words which have an ethical basis is 'the Assistant Practitioner/Intermediate Practitioner will bring any concern about the patient to the GP.' He or she will consider the need for hospitalisation. (The title of this 'practitioner' is nebulous and should be clearly defined.)