Please note that this website uses cookies necessary for the functioning of our website, cookies that optimize the performance, to provide social media features and to analyse website traffic.


Dear Reverend Fenton,

Below is the e-mail I sent you over 3 weeks ago.  No reply.  Assuming the e-mail address was incorrect, I sent a fuller letter by post about a week later.  There was silence, and after speaking with your wife last week who suggested that I 'phoned back in the afternoon, I did that.  I left a message saying that I knew it was a central duty of a priest to visit the sick, the frail and the dying.  You would often hear about the care they were getting and I was keen to hear your witness be it bad or good, or a spectrum.  It is apt that the Reverend Marshall's TFTD today was on visiting the sick.

I have been deeply hurt by your failure to respond to me.  I assume you harbour some animus towards me but I can only guess as to its spring.  Perhaps my standing for the Palestinians  in their slow, quick, quick, slow crucifixion is the source.  As a Christian atheist since age 17, I know that I have followed Christ in this.

Thank you Geoff.  I had read the much truncated 'confidential' report in the Guardian.  But this is more than stark.  Skimmed - so much evil to read here and everywhere.  I bet the opthalmologists at Taunton advised against this Poundland exercise.

I noted Conclusions 7 1 especially.  Outrageous.  And leaning over to make the 'letting' of a contract to an outfit run by 2 money grubbing GPs in BUCKINGHAMSHIRE sound normal and capable of high standards.  'The Practice' - what practice?

Dear NHS England and Mr Jeremy Hunt ,

We are assailed every few days by prescriptions from Mr Hunt.  There must be many professionals or retired ones who know the facts or analysis are faulty.

I served in OUR NHS as a doctor and orthopaedic/trauma surgeon for 40 years.  My interest in the service is as vital now as it was say 30 years ago.

Of many efforts to improve the standards of care at Torbay Hospital, I recall writing in the early 80s about the staffing of the ladies' fracture ward – Ainslie, at night.  There used to be 2 staff nurses - ie SRNs.  There were 25 patients (always 'full up'), many were bed bound and a few would be demented to varying degree.  I pleaded for more nurses.  An enrolled nurse (SEN) would have been a distinct help.  The excellent staff nurses could not take a meal break.  Nothing happened except that the care of some patients would have been second rate.

06.40    07-03-14

Dear John,

Thank you.  I still wish that you had answered those further points.  There is obviously no point in my pursuing these further concerns about the HW election with you.  I feel I am in an impenetrable thicket.  An example below - highlighted.  What is the point in asking for references after the election of candidates?  It is likely none will be negative or even disturbing, and thus causing HW to ask an individual to stand down.  And what would be the 'risk'?  2 hours of a good secretary's time and sixty stamps?  I did not know my 2 referees had not been asked by HW to give references.  I will have to explain the unusual set up to them.

But I am a tyro in these things; my reactions are simple and based on accepted moral principles and law, I believe.

Interim Chairman  Healthwatch Devon

RE: Election process HW Devon

Dear John,

Thank you for your letter of yesterday, 3-02-14.  The delay of about 5 days is regrettable due largely to incorrect addressing of your e-m to me.  You must have been tired because I received a shorter e-m from you that evening of 27-02-14.  And I wrote this, that same evening to make sure you had it right - 

Dear John,
I am yet to receive your response to my first e-mail addressed to you this last Sunday night.  You referred to your response in the e-mail below - highlighted.  It has obviously gone astray.  Do please re-send it.
This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
Thank you