Dear Mr Stourton,
I am addressing you in your journalistic role on this most beautiful day in AD 2019. I have in mind your need for the oft quoted 'balance' and for corroboration by a second. Sue and me are fortunate, on this edge of Dartmoor, to have helped Nature grow a garden in keeping with this day. The sun is lighting the beeches and, on the spur of the moment, we are opening it to passing humans.
Our brothers and sisters in Gaza, where I have been ten times, live under the same sun but are on the cross. Although now just 79, but with the same energy, I am barred by the Zionist entity from standing at the foot of that cross, some 80 miles from the original, in Gaza. ** Barred because I was one of sixteen humans without one bullet between us on MV Dignity ** which was rammed (attached) by one of three gun boats 66 miles off Haifa in the dark and in stiff seas 30-12-08. Just a speck of its destructive urge. The intention (I always look to the intention) was to drown every one of us - 'Muslim', 'Christian', atheist or Christian Atheist like me. The first words of the ramming captain over the FM radio (another was responsible for focusing a search light on our hull) - 'You are Terrorists'. We had enough spirit to want to join our fellows suffering yet another convulsion of killing by the unlawful entity. Unlawful by UNGA Resolution 194 and by its relentless, pitiless and lethal treatment of the native people. Thus I cannot continue the Voyage of the Dove and the Dolphin ** which, with the same spirit, began 1-02-03.
I have digressed but with reason. I cannot check the facts because, although I 'registered' with the BBC months ago, I cannot enter the BBC web site. I get only Mr Graham Norton but not his dirty innuendos you broadcast.
Dear Mr Woolvin,
You might be restrained in responding to me by your editor or the 'rules'.
The only truthful way of telling this story was to add 'an aim which was shared by the British Government under Mrs May.'
Being within the BBC bubble, you might think its broadcasting is benign. It is the opposite. A good example is the recent BBC output on McCain, helping to ramp up the cruel imperialist wars of the USA in which the UK almost always plays poodle. This article spells it out well by my friend Finian Cunningham.
The BBC consistently reports with bias on Palestine, showing little fairness towards the crucified native people. I have had much to do with the Palestinian people whose suffering is not told by the media here, nor the context.
The BBC reports daily on what I call our societal disintegration. Today it is the outrageous lack of specialist maths and physics teachers in particular, and in 'disadvantaged' areas.
Dear Mr Stourton and Mr Crawley,
This further e-mail should be directed to the producer but I do not have his address.
I scanned the last episode of Sunday – 16th of November, and found no content relevant to child abuse. The obduracy of the BBC in bringing forward the key facts in this most terrible crime fits with its illicit cover up of Thompson's knowledge that abuse by Savile was being investigated on good grounds by the Newsnight team before praise were then heaped upon this very devil.
Miles Goslett is a close friend. We worked together on another case where truth lies buried. I know what extreme efforts he went to in order to squeeze some truth from Thompson. It is no surprise that the BBC is so far of course having been headed by a man of this low calibre.
Dear 'Think' TV,
I seldom watch your programme nowadays because the black propaganda element is so large. It was confirmed tonight. I have not 'played it again' but hope my memory serves. Mr Frei introduced the subject of riotous behaviour at Bassingbourn Barracks and Ms Hilsum reported from the site.
Drunkeness and sexual assaults on women were among the charges against the cadets. A picture was painted of an amoral rabble. (You will recall that in the armed action to overthrow Ghaddafi the 'rebels' were sometimes called rabbles.)
From: David Halpin
Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2013 10:42 PM
Subject: C4 tonight
I seldom watch the ''News'' on either the BBC or C4 channel, but tonight I watched the latter. I was disgusted at the bias and the lack of corroboration.
In regard to 'chemical weapons' I noted you did not quote the UN lady who reported that a nerve gas had been used by the rebels in one attack. It would have been an easy matter to get shells to one of the c. 100 rabble groups. And if the Syrian army had used chemical weapons 27 times - cui bono . Would my colleague with his FRCS obtain advantage in this? It would be a certain way to call NATO bombs upon his head.