Please note that this website uses cookies necessary for the functioning of our website, cookies that optimize the performance, to provide social media features and to analyse website traffic.

From: David Halpin
Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2013 10:42 PM
To: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.; Snow, Jon; Miller, Jonathan; Smith, Sarah; Thomson, Alex
Subject: C4 tonight

I seldom watch the ''News'' on either the BBC or C4 channel, but tonight I watched the latter.  I was disgusted at the bias and the lack of corroboration.

In regard to 'chemical weapons' I noted you did not quote the UN lady who reported that a nerve gas had been used by the rebels in one attack.  It would have been an easy matter to get shells to one of the c. 100 rabble groups.  And if the Syrian army had used chemical weapons 27 times -   cui bono  .  Would my colleague with his FRCS obtain advantage in this?  It would be a certain way to call NATO bombs upon his head.

We have been used to Mr Jim Muir spewing his poisonous propaganda from the BBC office in Beirut and then saying, in a formulaic way, 'these allegations cannot be independently verified'.  Of course they cannot, especially when there is no word from a Syrian government spokesman.  So what is the justification for broadcasting them?

I noted this on Media Lens.

Atrocious bias on C4 news re chemical weapons in Syria Posted by Richard [User Info] [Email User] on June 5, 2013, 7:13 pm. I thought the BBC were bad enough but a report on tonights C4 news leads with the fall of Qusair then a series of totally unverified claims about the use of Sarin by the Syrian army (all claims made by the so called opposition) Not one representative of the Syrian government was interviewed.

The suggestion was made that the fall of the city will make the arming of the rebels "more likely tonight".
Dreadful it even included and interview with that ogre Hague!

- where Hague revealed his hypocrisy.

You obviously reckon on the population forgetting that the same pretexts were aired before the bombardment and invasion of Iraq  - by the paramount psychopath Blair.

It is very obvious C4 that you do the bidding of the Coalition government and of those nations that want to decimate Syria > Iran as per Oded Yinon - see Shahak.  And you call yourselves journalists.

For truth

David Halpin FRCS

"The size of the lie is a definite factor in causing it to be believed, for the vast masses of a nation are in the depths of their hearts
 more easily deceived than they are consciously and intentionally bad. The primitive simplicity of their minds renders them a more easy prey
 to a big lie than a small one, for they themselves often tell little lies, but would be ashamed to tell big lies.":
 Adolf Hitler (1889-1945) German Nazi Dictator 1935 Source: Mein Kampf, p. 197(?) 14th Edition.

On 05/06/13 23:54, Snow, Jon wrote:
Clearly you didnt listen tp what the UN guy said..both sides accused of using small quantities..the whole chemical weapons issue is a crap red are not alone in discovering that! So actually is any threat of Western intervention..the danger folk are the Saudis and the Qataris..Best Jon


To: Snow, Jon
Sent: Thursday, June 06, 2013 6:47 AM
Subject: Re: C4 tonight

Thank you.

I did listen to the UN man but you know it is no honest broker.  Consider the UN positions in Afghanistan - red herring of 9/11 but planned before it,  Iraq - WMD herrings and Libya.  All decimated as per Oded Yinon.

We agree use of 'chemical weapons' in Syria is a 'crap red herring'.  But why transmit it?  Because for one it is the red line, we are told, by the very cruel and unlawful US administration.  You transmit it because this 'pretext grasped from thin air' as I called Blair's lies before taking a ship to Palestine (with Gaza my target) in February 2003 was dinned into the prejudiced US and UK populations with some success.  From 6 million Sun readers to those who think the Grudian, Independent and Times tell the truth soak up the crap.

Let people like myself who have dealt with the suffering of illness and injury have some say.  I say 'no mother and child, in our still beautiful world, should be in the least harmed'.

I write about the psychopath and I have instanced Blair as being one of the most horrific.  The BBC choose to rehabilitate this monster.  Hare in the US has defined this very flawed human well.  Because they are ambitious and cunning, and utterly ruthless, they rise in our so called democracies and in the dictatorships.  They have proliferated in the last few decades.

Separately I ask - what has happened to C4 in the last few years?

I am off down to the 35 acres of woodland I planted 25 years ago.  I will enjoy the myriad colours of young oak and hear the blackbird and the yaffle.  But in my mind will be the weeping and the bleeding caused deliberately by mostly 'western' action backed by the primitive urges within the ignorant moral pygmies on both green and red leather.